Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC: connectivity module #2847

Closed
dengemann opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

DOC: connectivity module #2847

dengemann opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@dengemann
Copy link
Member

Public mental note:

  • better document the input data API, e.g. how tuples of (array, stc) are combined and what this does to the indices parameter
  • document the output API, depending on the method the need to be reshaped.

For later: write high-level object.

@dengemann dengemann added this to the 0.12 milestone Feb 4, 2016
@jasmainak jasmainak added the DOC label Feb 5, 2016
@larsoner larsoner modified the milestones: 0.13, 0.12 Apr 20, 2016
@larsoner
Copy link
Member

Moved to 0.13, feel free to close if you get it done before 0.12 comes out

@larsoner
Copy link
Member

Removing milestone label

@larsoner larsoner removed this from the 0.13 milestone Sep 16, 2016
@larsoner larsoner mentioned this issue Mar 6, 2017
19 tasks
@AdoNunes
Copy link
Contributor

@dengemann Is this still necessary to fix?

@dengemann
Copy link
Member Author

yes I think nothing has changed.

@agramfort
Copy link
Member

agramfort commented Sep 30, 2019 via email

@dengemann
Copy link
Member Author

You should do a for loop over parameters for the connectivity function and see if you understand what it takes to reassemble a proper square matrix. This is what needs to be documented.

@drammock drammock added the HARD label Sep 30, 2019
@mmagnuski
Copy link
Member

I think this can be closed with connectivity being moving to mne-connectivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants