You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In cases where we have a very dense dataset, setting maxlag will not help the performance of the variogram calculation. Randomly sampling the points prior to creating the variogram is one option, but might lead to a high error in the variogram. It would be better in such a situation to randomly sample the point pairs.
Using a MetricSpacePair with two different random point samples instead of a MetricSpace would achieve this. It would need to be wrapped in something that makes the output of dists() square (and even more sparse).
What do you think of this solution?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In cases where we have a very dense dataset, setting maxlag will not help the performance of the variogram calculation. Randomly sampling the points prior to creating the variogram is one option, but might lead to a high error in the variogram. It would be better in such a situation to randomly sample the point pairs.
Using a
MetricSpacePair
with two different random point samples instead of aMetricSpace
would achieve this. It would need to be wrapped in something that makes the output ofdists()
square (and even more sparse).What do you think of this solution?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: