You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Tuesday Feb 18 @ 15:00 UTC in grincoin#dev channel on Keybase. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.
Proposed agenda
A yeasty reminiscence
Agenda review
Action point follow ups from previous meetings
Tracking issue created for all-libs-in-one-builder? @quentinlesceller
If we’re going to take the stance that softforks are hacks, and hardforks should be used when possible, then we’ll want to plan for more frequent hardforks. If instead we decide they’re a useful way to apply backward-compatible updates, we may choose to try avoiding hardforks at all costs.
In terms of technical implications, @tromp writes:
We need to decide how to treat blocks with unknown header version,
and kernels with unknown features. Some soft-forking is possible by accepting either, but care must be taken that the latter is properly deserialized and that signatures are still verified as much as possible.
Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Tuesday Feb 18 @ 15:00 UTC in grincoin#dev channel on Keybase. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.
Proposed agenda
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: