You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Tuesday Nov 27 @ 15:00 UTC in Grin/Dev Gitter. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.
I wrote in the Gitter that I didn't have anything to add to the agenda, but I lied! Added point 8 here above. Basically, with only a few weeks ahead of Mainnet, I would like to propose that we start to adopt a more formalized review process of PRs that get merged. Don't know what that should be exactly, but I think some kind of definition of what it takes for a PR to get merged would be helpful, no matter how basic that would be.
Regarding the review process, we agreed on the following at least for the time being:
1.Trivial PRs can be directly merged
2. Non trivial PRs need at least one review
3. Identified consensus-touching PRs need 2 reviews
4. Igno stops committing straight in the repo, even once in a while
There was some concern on the first point but developers all felt it was still too early to force reviews even on trivial issues. Note that the absence of a formal on a trivial PR doesn't stop anyone from checking whether it was actually trivial.
Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Tuesday Nov 27 @ 15:00 UTC in Grin/Dev Gitter. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.
Proposed agenda
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: