-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Functionality for PRs merged without review #207
Comments
If anyone else is interested in this being a part of the app, please comment or react to the thread. :) |
Sir , is this open for work ? |
Sure! We already have an idea of how we want to build this, but you're welcome to pitch your idea of how you see this being built. In case you'd prefer to go with our idea itself, that's totally fine. Let us know how you want to proceed. |
@jayantbh will proceed with your idea and here visual change meant ? , i have not much exp with flask , will work on that and i will have to create a route in pull_requests.py file for fetching the Prs which are not reviewed based on a team_id . |
By visual change, I mean that if you see the original issue description, you'll see it talks about a UI change as well. That. 🙂 |
@jayantbh thanks got it , thought it meant something different |
|
Sure, I believe @samad-yar-khan might be able to help here. |
@RISHIKESHk07 get_settings_service() is a getter that fetches the SettingsService after injecting all the dependencies. Here we are first fetching the SettingsService and then fetching a specific setting using get_setting method. The |
@jayantbh @samad-yar-khan , this is my solution for making a backend route , please correct if i it is flawed |
@jayantbh does the above look fine ?? |
I think it doesn't need to be a separate screen. This could be a small widget thing on one of the existing UIs. If every metric is on its own page it'll be difficult to get the whole picture from any single point. |
Alright that does sound better than a whole page , do we use a component lib for styling ? , does the backend route creation look fine ? |
I'll let @samad-yar-khan chime in on the API path. Visually, it can be shown in the lead time/cycle time sidebar beside the CT/LT breakdown, like this: |
@samad-yar-khan Made a Pr |
@jayantbh @samad-yar-khan any suggestions |
Hey @samad-yar-khan , @jayantbh This issue sounds interesting to me, |
Hey @VipinDevelops, sure! |
Why do we need this ?
Acceptance Criteria
Task 1, 2, 3 can be done in seperate PRs.
Further Comments / References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: