Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Interactive Upgrade #1136

Open
RichiCoder1 opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Interactive Upgrade #1136

RichiCoder1 opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
Issue-Feature This is a feature request for the Windows Package Manager client.

Comments

@RichiCoder1
Copy link

RichiCoder1 commented Jun 8, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Interactive Upgrade: The ability to receive a list of upgradable apps, and interactively select which ones to upgrade.

Simplifies cases where I want to upgrade a subset of apps, but I also don't necessarily want to pin (#476) apps either.

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

A variation of winget upgrade that accepts something like --select (or something else good, -i is already taken) that gets the same "upgradable" list, but allows you to select which packages to upgrade and then upgrades that subset. Assumes rich TTY support
@RichiCoder1 RichiCoder1 added the Issue-Feature This is a feature request for the Windows Package Manager client. label Jun 8, 2021
@ghost ghost added the Needs-Triage Issue need to be triaged label Jun 8, 2021
@denelon denelon removed the Needs-Triage Issue need to be triaged label Jun 8, 2021
@denelon denelon added this to the Backlog - Windows Package Manager milestone Jun 8, 2021
@denelon denelon removed this from the Backlog-Client milestone Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Issue-Feature This is a feature request for the Windows Package Manager client.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RichiCoder1 @denelon