You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
VSCode Version: latest | downloaded now 20160401220400
OS Version: Ubuntu Linux Xenial | latest updates as of right now (just an example)
Steps to Reproduce:
Download VS Code for Linux 32|64 & Extracting|Unpacking|Unzipping it to a FAT-XX|exFAT|UDF-based drive
Try to launch it
TARGET: Running VS Code from drives which are formatted with file-systems, which do NOT support USER-RIGHTS or similar mechanisms; for example from:
EFS-Partitions
SD-|CF-|-Cards
Shared partitions for cross-platform-use
I am totally aware of the NEEDs of specific OSs, but i am asking for A-WAY-AROUND.
Does such a way exist? If so, what would be the generic VS-Code-Whopper-to-consume-right-here-and-now-independent-of-my-origin-location-and-target?
I am having a very deep-going feeling that VS Code would be able to salute under such conditions, do not ask me why.
Does anyone think that the described (or at least a specific variant of it) could be possible? If so, please add your 2-million-cents (means a very detailed) comment to this issue a.k.a. request;
Thanks for your interest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If this is indeed about running from a drive that does not have read access, this can be fixed with the --user-data-dir command line arg coming in the April release (see #3068).
Steps to Reproduce:
TARGET: Running VS Code from drives which are formatted with file-systems, which do NOT support USER-RIGHTS or similar mechanisms; for example from:
I am totally aware of the NEEDs of specific OSs, but i am asking for A-WAY-AROUND.
Does such a way exist? If so, what would be the generic VS-Code-Whopper-to-consume-right-here-and-now-independent-of-my-origin-location-and-target?
I am having a very deep-going feeling that VS Code would be able to salute under such conditions, do not ask me why.
Does anyone think that the described (or at least a specific variant of it) could be possible? If so, please add your 2-million-cents (means a very detailed) comment to this issue a.k.a. request;
Thanks for your interest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: