Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: semantic highlighting support #1534

Closed
niieani opened this issue Dec 21, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Suggestion: semantic highlighting support #1534

niieani opened this issue Dec 21, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
feature-request Request for new features or functionality
Milestone

Comments

@niieani
Copy link

niieani commented Dec 21, 2015

It would be great if VS Code supported the paradigm of semantic highlighting.
In short, it makes syntax highlighting more useful, by varying the colors of the same syntax-types of different names in a given scope. This makes it easier to catch mistakes and to see the flow of variables (since every variable in a given scope has a unique color, yet based of the same color range).
Here's an in depth explanation of what is is with some examples: https://medium.com/@evnbr/coding-in-color-3a6db2743a1e#.n2zb9ohw8

Example - before:

Before

Example - after:

After

@bpasero bpasero added the feature-request Request for new features or functionality label Dec 21, 2015
@bpasero bpasero added this to the Backlog milestone Dec 21, 2015
@bpasero
Copy link
Member

bpasero commented Dec 21, 2015

@dbaeumer fyi

@Wosi
Copy link

Wosi commented Dec 21, 2015

I think it's the same request as "Provide an API for advanced source highlighting": #585

@egamma
Copy link
Member

egamma commented Dec 21, 2015

Closing as a duplicate of #585

@egamma egamma closed this as completed Dec 21, 2015
@vscodebot vscodebot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 18, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature-request Request for new features or functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants