-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Local Kernel Spec is a dead end #12224
Comments
should add an item with an information link as suggested my @amunger |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Is that not exactly what we are doing with the kernel picker now, as kernels get lazily discovered and loaded into the picker? I don't see the problem. re: an info link, are kernel specs a really useful feature that we want to educate users on? If not, then why add a link on how to add kernel specs? I would expect that a user who needs to create kernel specs already understands this functionality. |
If we wait for kernel to be discovered, then lazy loading is pointless (and will be slower to display this item) |
Solution: Display this item only when we have discovered local kernelspecs |
Testing #11963
I honest don't really know "Local Kernel Spec" is all about but I'd suggest to (1) don't give me that option to begin with or (2) show a message why this is empty and how I can populate it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: