-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Filter primary table on conditions on secondary table #300
Comments
Thank you for reaching out. Unfortunately that is not supported. As a workaround you can make the other table the primary table or do two requests. |
@mevdschee Why can this not be supported? |
It can. I'll make this a feature request. |
Can you provide some insight on where in your code I would make this happen? I can code it in. |
@mevdschee ^^^^ |
@mevdschee any idea on if and when you could get this implemented? maybe a parameter that allows this feature to be included or not. |
Same request. |
Any update on this or any update on my question see my quote.
|
In the current implementation I see no straightforward way to build this. I'm currently rewriting this software (in java, see: https://github.com/mevdschee/java-crud-api) and maybe the new implementation structure allows this, but I doubt it. That java implementation will be backported to this project as version 2.x. Not sure when this feature will be available.. if ever.. |
An update: This will NOT be included in v2. |
If the matching column is found on a relationship table instead of the primary table, how could I limit records that are shown on the primary?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: