-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
spectral radius for scalar wave equation #9
Comments
Re inputs: |
Oh man, I'd love to see a simple Python FEM package without C++ (beyond those in numpy/scipy). Anyway, this seems a little too specific with all the input argument. You'd want to pin one single value for each mesh. Looking at the spectral radius is actually a good idea, I'll add that for the Laplacian. |
Yea, I think I agree it's a little too specific but the spectral radius in general is useful as it incorporates both the discretization (order and such) and the mesh quality at the same time. For my application the difference between a minimum dihedral angle bound of 1 degree and 18 degrees means a variation in maximum stable timestep between 0.0001 and 0.0012 seconds. To get that high of a dihedral angle bound, I typically need to iterate with DistMesh 300-500 iterations (depending on the minimum element size). |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: