You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The problem here is that the support array first has the information about Edge 16, where the feature is supported behind a flag, and then subsequently has information about Edge 17, where it's fully supported by default.
The reason this is a problem is because Kumascript assumes that the support array will have the proper support info first, which in this case doesn't happen.
// the first entry should be the most relevant/recent and will be treated as "the truth"checkSupport(supportInfo[0].version_added,supportInfo[0].version_removed);
If we make this assumption, we should try to enforce it with the linter somehow, though I'm not sure how you'd go about doing that. 🤔
queengooborg
added
duplicate
Duplicate issues or pull requests. This one is closed in favor of the other issue or pull request.
invalid
Invalid issues or pull requests (wrong repo, spam, duplicates, etc.). This won't get merged. Sorry!
labels
Aug 18, 2019
queengooborg
removed
the
invalid
Invalid issues or pull requests (wrong repo, spam, duplicates, etc.). This won't get merged. Sorry!
label
Jun 21, 2021
On the ServiceWorker page, this happens:
The problem here is that the support array first has the information about Edge 16, where the feature is supported behind a flag, and then subsequently has information about Edge 17, where it's fully supported by default.
The
ServiceWorker.json
file has these lines:browser-compat-data/api/ServiceWorker.json
Lines 16 to 29 in 6cad84a
The reason this is a problem is because Kumascript assumes that the support array will have the proper support info first, which in this case doesn't happen.
See these lines in kumascript:
If we make this assumption, we should try to enforce it with the linter somehow, though I'm not sure how you'd go about doing that. 🤔
Here's an example where it works properly
From the flex page
browser-compat-data/css/properties/flex.json
Lines 44 to 78 in 01c2b6d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: