Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GS vs points of largest leverage for initial designs #2

Open
mdlerch opened this issue Dec 23, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

GS vs points of largest leverage for initial designs #2

mdlerch opened this issue Dec 23, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@mdlerch
Copy link
Owner

mdlerch commented Dec 23, 2014

Is GS faster than largest leverage for finding an initial design, especially when candidate set is large?

See #1

@joncheryl
Copy link
Collaborator

I think I can prove that the largest leverage method results in the same initial design as the GS method. I also believe that it is waaaaaaaaaaay faster. I think what Wheeler describes in that expository doc is actually the greedy algorithm for determining the points in the candidate set of greatest leverage. I don't think it would be quick.

As you may have seen, several of the functions in Armadillo are based on the SVD. I would assume it's because it's a quicker way to go about computing certain things. It fact, this may be the fastest method for getting those points.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants