You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is this necessary when we are already passing Xc (the candidate set?)
I was trying to future proof for when there exists an option to specify necessary design points.
I don't see how it would work with the complete vector (naively I was thinking that the vector would just be a subset of 1:n). Now I suspect what we will need is a vector that indexes the non-necessary indexes in current.
So, if it's an 8 point design and we want to specify that points 1 and 2 are required, then current would be a vector of length 8 with the indexes of the current points and swappable (or something) will be a vector of [2,3,4,5,6,7,8](that is, 0 and 1 are not swappable).
I updated the complete argument based on adding the repeated option. Now the argument is called candidateidx is a list of legal indices to use as next proposition. We should add a new argument if/when we get to the point of necessary design points.
Is this necessary when we are already passing Xc (the candidate set?)
I was trying to future proof for when there exists an option to specify necessary design points.
I don't see how it would work with the complete vector (naively I was thinking that the vector would just be a subset of
1:n
). Now I suspect what we will need is a vector that indexes the non-necessary indexes in current.So, if it's an 8 point design and we want to specify that points 1 and 2 are required, then current would be a vector of length 8 with the indexes of the current points and
swappable
(or something) will be a vector of [2,3,4,5,6,7,8](that is, 0 and 1 are not swappable).https://github.com/mdlerch/OptimalDesign/blob/1214e8bf0b2350dc6818db8e057505420a66cfd3/src/fedorov.cpp#L13-14
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: