We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not sure how to fix these, but consider the following (under SBCL 1.3.1)
(let ((*print-length* 14)) (quickcheck (when *testing* (for-all ((s (lambda () (funcall an-integer)))) (is= s s)) (for-all ((s (lambda () (funcall a-boolean)))) (isnt= s (not s))) (for-all ((s #'a-string)) (is= s s))) ))
I could not get something like ((s #'an-integer)) to work, because define, the scheme-like, didn't actually make a function, that is, instead of
((s #'an-integer))
define
(cond ((symbolp binding) `(defparameter ,binding (lambda () ,@body))) ...
it has
(cond ((symbolp binding) `(defparameter ,binding ,@body)) ...
I didn't want to submit a pull request on this without consulting you because it might break a bunch of other stuff.
I'll submit the other problem in a different issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If something might break, add more tests.
As long as the coverage is high, it's okay to refactor!
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ok, great. Let me see what I can do.
No branches or pull requests
Not sure how to fix these, but consider the following (under SBCL 1.3.1)
I could not get something like
((s #'an-integer))
to work, becausedefine
, the scheme-like, didn't actually make a function, that is, instead ofit has
I didn't want to submit a pull request on this without consulting you because it might break a bunch of other stuff.
I'll submit the other problem in a different issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: