-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Conversation
f87d3b0
to
b6ac5e4
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4879 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 59.59% 77.73% +18.14%
============================================
Files 326 326
Lines 33925 34107 +182
Branches 5597 5660 +63
============================================
+ Hits 20218 26514 +6296
+ Misses 12294 5965 -6329
- Partials 1413 1628 +215 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4879 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 59.59% 77.62% +18.03%
============================================
Files 326 326
Lines 33925 34617 +692
Branches 5597 5810 +213
============================================
+ Hits 20218 26873 +6655
+ Misses 12294 6088 -6206
- Partials 1413 1656 +243 |
tox.ini
Outdated
commands = | ||
/usr/bin/find "{toxinidir}" -name '*.pyc' -delete | ||
# Make all greater-thans equals so we test the oldest version of our direct | ||
# dependencies, but make the pyopenssl 17.0, which can work against an | ||
# OpenSSL 1.1 compiled cryptography (as older ones don't compile on Travis). | ||
/bin/sh -c 'python -m synapse.python_dependencies | sed -e "s/>=/==/g" -e "s/psycopg2==2.6//" -e "s/pyopenssl==16.0.0/pyopenssl==17.0.0/" | xargs pip install' | ||
# Install Synapse itself. This won't update any libraries. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the comment was your friend
pip install -e . | ||
{envbindir}/trial {env:TRIAL_FLAGS:} {posargs:tests} {env:TOXSUFFIX:} | ||
|
||
{envbindir}/coverage run "{envbindir}/trial" {env:TRIAL_FLAGS:} {posargs:tests} {env:TOXSUFFIX:} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we actually need to run the coverage checks here? is there any reason to imagine the coverage will be any different to the other runs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The same could be said for a lot of tests tbh, I'd rather we just consistently did coverage stats than have to figure out which tests do and which don't.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm then
No description provided.