(An alternative to MSC3910.)
Currently, access to media in Matrix has the following problems:
- The only protection for media is the obscurity of the URL, and URLs are easily leaked (eg accidental sharing, access logs). synapse#2150
- Anybody (including non-matrix users) can cause a homeserver to copy media into its local store. synapse#2133
- When a media event is redacted, the media it used remains visible to all. synapse#1263
- There is currently no way to delete media. matrix-spec#226
- If a user requests GDPR erasure, their media remains visible to all.
- When all users leave a room, their media is not deleted from the server.
This proposal builds on MSC3916 (which adds authentication to media download), to require that the authenticated user is authorised to access the requested media.
After an item of media is uploaded, it must be linked to an event (via
parameters to the /send
api). A given piece of media is only visible
to a user if the user can see the corresponding event.
-
A new "media upload" endpoint is defined,
POST /_matrix/client/v1/media/upload
. It is based on the existing/_matrix/media/v3/upload
endpoint, but media uploaded this way is not initially viewable (except to the user that uploaded it). This is referred to as a "restricted" media item.The existing endpoint is deprecated. Media uploaded via the existing endpoint is "unrestricted".
-
Attaching media
-
The methods for sending events (
PUT /_matrix/client/v3/rooms/{roomId}/state/{eventType}/{stateKey}
andPUT /_matrix/client/v3/rooms/{roomId}/send/{eventType}/{txnId}
) are extended to take a query parameterattach_media
, whose value must be a completemxc:
URI.The
attach_media
parameter may be used several times to attach several pieces of media to the same event. The maximum number of pieces of media that can be attached to a single event is implementation-defined by servers.If any of the
attach_media
parameters do not correspond to known restricted media items, or they refer to restricted media items that have already been attached, the server responds with a 400 error withM_INVALID_PARAM
.Sending an event in this manner associates the media with the sent event. From then on, the media can be seen by any user who can see the event itself.
Servers should ensure that sending an event remains an idempotent operation: in particular, if a client sends an event with a media attachment, and then repeats the operation with identical parameters, a 200 response must be returned (with the original event ID) even though the media has already been attached.
-
Alternatively, if a restricted media item is referenced in a call to
PUT /_matrix/client/v3/profile/{userId}/avatar_url
it is instead attached to the user's profile.Again, if the media is already attached, the server responds with a 400 error with
M_INVALID_PARAM
.
If the media is not attached to either an event or a profile within a reasonable period (say, ten minutes), then the server is free to assume that the user has changed their mind (or the client has gone offline), and may clean up the uploaded media.
-
-
Additional checks on
/download
and/thumbnail
endpointsThe new
/download
and/thumbnail
endpoints added in MSC3916 are updated the server must check if the requesting user or server has permission to see the corresponding event. If not, the server responds with a 403 error andM_UNAUTHORIZED
. -
Federation API returns a
restrictions
propertyThe
/_matrix/federation/v1/media/download
and/_matrix/federation/v1/media/thumbnail
endpoints specified by MSC3916 are extended: the returned json object may have a propertyrestrictions
.If there is no
restrictions
property, the media is a legacy "unrestricted" media. Otherwise,restrictions
should be a JSON object with one of the following properties:event_id
: the event id of the event to which the media is attached.profile_user_id
: the user id of the user to whose profile the media is attached.
It is invalid for both
event_id
andprofile_user_id
to be set.The requesting server must check the restrictions list, and only return the requested media to users who have permission to view the relevant event or profile. If the requesting server caches the media, it must also cache the restrictions list.
If neither
event_id
norprofile_user_id
are present, the requesting user should assume that an unknown restriction is present, and not allow access to any user.An example response:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=gc0p4Jq0M2Yt08jU534c0p --gc0p4Jq0M2Yt08jU534c0p Content-Type: application/json { "restrictions": { "event_id": "$Rqnc-F-dvnEYJTyHq_iKxU2bZ1CI92-kuZq3a5lr5Zg" }} --gc0p4Jq0M2Yt08jU534c0p Content-Type: text/plain This media is plain text. Maybe somebody used it as a paste bin. --gc0p4Jq0M2Yt08jU534c0p
-
New "media copy" API
A new endpoint is defined:
POST /_matrix/client/v1/media/copy/{serverName}/{mediaId}
. The body of the request must be a JSON object, but there are no required parameters.Conceptually, the API makes a new copy of a media item. (In practice, the server will probably make a new reference to an existing media item, but that is an implementation detail).
The response is a json object with a required
content_uri
property, giving a new MXC URI referring to the media.The new media item can be attached to a new event, and generally functions in every way the same as uploading a brand new media item.
This "copy" api is to be used by clients when forwarding events with media attachments.
(This mechanism, rather than just allowing clients to attach media to multiple events, is necessary to ensure that the list of events attached a given piece of media does not grow over time, which would make it difficult for servers to reliably cache media and impose the correct access restrictions.)
-
Autogenerated
m.room.member
eventsServers will generate
m.room.member
events with anavatar_url
whenever one of their users joins a room, or changes their profile picture.Such events must each use a different copy of the media item, in the same way as the "media copy" API described above.
-
Backwards compatibility mechanisms
For backwards compatibility with older clients and requesting servers: servers may for a short time choose to allow unauthenticated access via the deprecated
/_matrix/media/v3
endpoints, even for restricted media. -
URL preview
The
/preview_url
endpoint returns an object that references an image for the previewed site.It is expected that servers will continue to treat such media as unrestricted (at least for local users), but it would be legitimate for them to, for example, return a different
mxc:
URI for each requesting user, and only allow each user access to the correspondingmxc:
URI.
The following discusses the impact of this proposal on various parts of ecosystem: we consider the changes that will be required for existing implementations, and how the proposal will facilitate future extensions.
These bridges have previously been discussed in MSC3916, however this proposal adds a new problem.
These bridges currently use the content repository as a paste-bin: large text messages are uploaded as plain-text media, and a link is then sent to the remote network. This will become problematic, because servers are entitled to remove any media that does not get linked to an event.
Solutions might include:
- the bridge hosting its own content repository for this usecase
- using an external service
- special-casing the bridge AS user to permit it to upload media without expiry.
These likewise were previously discussed in MSC3916.
We need to ensure that the icons are not deleted from the content repository even though they have not been attached to any event or profile. It would be wise for servers to provide administrators with a mechanism to upload media without attaching it to anything.
Under this proposal, servers can determine which media is referenced by an event that is redacted, and add that media to a list to be cleaned up.
This would also apply if all users in a room are deactivated (either via a GDPR section 17 request or by a self-requested "Deactivate account" request). In this case, all events in the room, and all media referenced by them, should be removed. Currently, Synapse does not support removing the events (see also synapse#4720); but if at some point in the future this is added, then this proposal makes it easy to extend to deleting the media.
Fixes synapse#1263.
-
Since each
m.room.member
references the avatar separately, changing your avatar will cause an even bigger traffic storm if you're in a lot of rooms.In addition, this could cause duplication of media in the remote media cache, if the implementation does not take steps to deduplicate (eg, storing media by content hash rather than media id).
-
Have the "upload" endpoint return a nonce, which can then be used in the "send" endpoint in place of the
mxc
uri. It's hard to see what advantage this gives, beyond the fact a nonce could be smaller so marginally fewer bytes to send. -
Use some sort of "content token" for each piece of media, and require clients to provide it, per MSC3910.
- Letting servers track the relationship between events and media is a metadata leak, especially for e2ee rooms.
TODO
MSC3916 "Authentication for media access, and new endpoint names".
-
Credit: this proposal is based on ideas from @jcgruenhage and @anoadragon453 at https://cryptpad.fr/code/#/2/code/view/oWjZciD9N1aWTr1IL6GRZ0k1i+dm7wJQ7juLf4tJRoo/
-
MSC
7013796: a predecessor of this proposal -
MSC2461: adds per-user authentication but does not attempt to restrict access to individual items of media.
-
MSC2278: Deleting attachments for expired and redacted messages
-
MSC1902: Split the media repo into s2s and c2s parts
-
MSC2846: Decentralizing media through CIDs