-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upstream merge 1.13 #1287
Closed
Closed
Upstream merge 1.13 #1287
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If the EIP-1559 is activated, reject 0-priced transactions in the rpc level
…(#28525) This is the fix to issue #27483. A new hiddenBytes() is introduced to calculate the byte size of hidden items in the freezer table. When reporting the size of the freezer table, size of the hidden items will be subtracted from the total size. --------- Co-authored-by: Yifan <Yifan Wang> Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <[email protected]>
As documented on https://golangci-lint.run/usage/performance/ , a lower GOGC value causes less peak mem consumption when running the linter. Exceeding 3Gb is a common cause for build failures, according to https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#my-build-script-is-killed-without-any-error
Bumps [golang.org/x/crypto](https://github.com/golang/crypto) from 0.15.0 to 0.17.0. - [Commits](golang/crypto@v0.15.0...v0.17.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: golang.org/x/crypto dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This is primarily to make lint work again on macOS 14. The older version of golangci-lint kept crashing. Also included is a fix for a goroutine leak in the recently-introduced function MustRunCommandWithOutput.
Here we update the eth and snap protocol test suites with a new test chain, created by the hivechain tool. The new test chain uses proof-of-stake. As such, tests using PoW block propagation in the eth protocol are removed. The test suite now connects to the node under test using the engine API in order to make it accept transactions. The snap protocol test suite has been rewritten to output test descriptions and log requests more verbosely. --------- Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <[email protected]>
Original problem was caused by #28595, where we made it so that as soon as we start to sync, the root of the disk layer is deleted. That is not wrong per se, but another part of the code uses the "presence of the root" as an init-check for the pathdb. And, since the init-check now failed, the code tried to re-initialize it which failed since a sync was already ongoing. The total impact being: after a state-sync has begun, if the node for some reason is is shut down, it will refuse to start up again, with the error message: `Fatal: Failed to register the Ethereum service: waiting for sync.`. This change also modifies how `geth removedb` works, so that the user is prompted for two things: `state data` and `ancient chain`. The former includes both the chaindb aswell as any state history stored in ancients. --------- Co-authored-by: Martin HS <[email protected]>
This pull request improves the condition to check if path state scheme is in use. Originally, root node presence was used as the indicator if path scheme is used or not. However due to fact that root node will be deleted during the initial snap sync, this condition is no longer useful. If PersistentStateID is present, it shows that we've already configured for path scheme.
Release 1.13.8
slog.SetDefault has undesirable side effects. It also sets the default logger destination, for example. So we should not call it by default in init.
cmd/evm: fixes the blob gas calculation if a transaction is invalid
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Martin HS <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <[email protected]>
Node discovery periodically revalidates the nodes in its table by sending PING, checking if they are still alive. I recently noticed some issues with the implementation of this process, which can cause strange results such as nodes dropping unexpectedly, certain nodes not getting revalidated often enough, and bad results being returned to incoming FINDNODE queries. In this change, the revalidation process is improved with the following logic: - We maintain two 'revalidation lists' containing the table nodes, named 'fast' and 'slow'. - The process chooses random nodes from each list on a randomized interval, the interval being faster for the 'fast' list, and performs revalidation for the chosen node. - Whenever a node is newly inserted into the table, it goes into the 'fast' list. Once validation passes, it transfers to the 'slow' list. If a request fails, or the node changes endpoint, it transfers back into 'fast'. - livenessChecks is incremented by one for successful checks. Unlike the old implementation, we will not drop the node on the first failing check. We instead quickly decay the livenessChecks give it another chance. - Order of nodes in bucket doesn't matter anymore. I am also adding a debug API endpoint to dump the node table content. Co-authored-by: Martin HS <[email protected]>
In #29572, I assumed the revalidation list that the node is contained in could only ever be changed by the outcome of a revalidation request. But turns out that's not true: if the node gets removed due to FINDNODE failure, it will also be removed from the list it is in. This causes a crash. The invariant is: while node is in table, it is always in exactly one of the two lists. So it seems best to store a pointer to the current list within the node itself.
enode.Node has separate accessor functions for getting the IP, UDP port and TCP port. These methods performed separate checks for attributes set in the ENR. With this PR, the accessor methods will now return cached information, and the endpoint is determined when the node is created. The logic to determine the preferred endpoint is now more correct, and considers how 'global' each address is when both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are present in the ENR.
It seems the semantic differences between addFoundNode and addInboundNode were lost in (and are unsure if is available) whereas addInboundNode is for adding nodes that have contacted the local node and we can verify they are active. handleAddNode seems to be the consolidation of those two methods, yet it bumps the node in the bucket (updating it's IP addr) even if the node was not an inbound. This PR fixes this. It wasn't originally caught in tests like TestTable_addSeenNode because the manipulation of the node object actually modified the node value used by the test. New logic is added to reject non-inbound updates unless the sequence number of the (signed) ENR increases. Inbound updates, which are published by the updated node itself, are always accepted. If an inbound update changes the endpoint, the node will be revalidated on an expedited schedule. Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <[email protected]>
Here we clean up internal uses of type discover.node, converting most code to use enode.Node instead. The discover.node type used to be the canonical representation of network hosts before ENR was introduced. Most code worked with *node to avoid conversions when interacting with Table methods. Since *node also contains internal state of Table and is a mutable type, using *node outside of Table code is prone to data races. It's also cleaner not having to wrap/unwrap *enode.Node all the time. discover.node has been renamed to tableNode to clarify its purpose. While here, we also change most uses of net.UDPAddr into netip.AddrPort. While this is technically a separate refactoring from the *node -> *enode.Node change, it is more convenient because *enode.Node handles IP addresses as netip.Addr. The switch to package netip in discovery would've happened very soon anyway. The change to netip.AddrPort stops at certain interface points. For example, since package p2p/netutil has not been converted to use netip.Addr yet, we still have to convert to net.IP/net.UDPAddr in a few places.
Co-authored-by: Stefan <[email protected]>
v1.3.3 release
Back merge master to develop after v1.3.3 release
…nfigs in bor (#1264) * add: enforce 30gwei for gas related configs in bor * chg: fix lint
p2p: cherry-pick commits from geth for peering issues
Signed-off-by: dufucun <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dufucun <[email protected]>
Can you first make sure that develop is merged into |
This PR is stale because it has been open 21 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days. |
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 35 days with no activity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Takes upstream from release/1.13 (v1.13.15), yet to be tested.
Changes
Breaking changes
Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it
Nodes audience
In case this PR includes changes that must be applied only to a subset of nodes, please specify how you handled it (e.g. by adding a flag with a default value...)
Checklist
Cross repository changes
Testing
Manual tests
Please complete this section with the steps you performed if you ran manual tests for this functionality, otherwise delete it
Additional comments
Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it