Replies: 4 comments
-
@mathuo is this something you can consider? Thanks :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Changing the name is a major change and will break backward compatibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If dockview did start supporting multiple frameworks it would make sense to rename dockview-core to dockview and then maintain packages appropiately named dockview- (e.g. dockview-react, dockview-angular etc.) It would however be a dramatic break in functionality so to start with at least it probably wouldn't follow those names but I do think it would be worth the breaking change once dockview has at least one additional framework supported and we could achieve that through a major version release (e.g. 1.x.x -> 2.x.x) Short answer is yes the idea is for dockview to support multiple frameworks through seperate packages but having ideal namings may take a little time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think it's much simpler -
That way you're not breaking the change of the dockview package, projects will just need to use the new name and not worry about it suddenly changing entirely. But, as suggested, I will first build the wrapper as suggested. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
Would you consider changing the name of
dockview
todockview-react
and add adockview-angular
wrapper?I'm able to write the angular wrapper if needed :)
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions