-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alternative to current Web UI #27
Comments
What exactly do you mean with "getting very complicated"? Is there anything that will fundamentally change soon that I missed? AFAICT both
The security implications could be dealt with, they're not a real issue. To me it's all about target audience. I built the service exactly for people who don't want to learn about the host of options - most of which we didn't document anyway. The few options the web GUI actually offers are what I was asked to provide by the users. I'd be more than happy to extend it with anything there is real demand for. My thinking has so far been that anyone who needs to dig into Things will get a bit more complicated once the options for the different branches diverge. Implementing support for ESP32, which I think is getting absolutely essential, needs to solve that. |
Marcel, We keep adding extra features that chip away at RAM availability -- even if the app doesn't use the feature. This is worse when
|
Thanks for the great listing Terry! For me the options fall into one of these categories:
What remains is that the cloud build should maybe offer to disable WIFI_SDK_EVENT_MONITOR_ENABLE and GPIO_INTERRUPT_ENABLE even though I would leave both enabled by default. Of course, LFS will have a major impact and the cloud builder needs to support it. Just wish my day had 48h. |
Initially I used the cloud builder for NodeMCU, and moved to local builds only to fix a bug in ow.c. I think it gives quite enough flexibility for the first-time user, though LFS will certainly require an update to the interface. And building from scratch, anyway on Linux, is very straightforward - just git fetch and make. Adding the table above to the FAQ would be very helpful; I hadn't understood, or heard of, most of those options. Will |
@cwrseck Will, have you seen my reference to this version of the |
No, I'm using the 2.1 and 2.2 releases. The new user_config.h looks to b a considerable improvement from where I'm standing; really useful information. Thanks - Will |
Marcel, I would like the CBS to support LFS builds at the same time that we pull this into dev, which should be in the next week or so. Given this can I again request that we have a menu option to support cloud builds with the following parameters:
Lastly as well as the firmware bin files, you should also document how to download Thanks Terry |
Terry, I understand your motivation behind this request and I agree the cloud builder should support LFS. However, I've got currently so little extra time that I can't do it all alone. Let me make a proposal.
|
Marcel,
Things are getting very complicated on the cloud builder UI front. As well as the obvious modules selection options, we now have a host of
user_config.h
options that can be tweeked. Instead of trying to provide a web UI to do that various check boxes and number options, why not just have an options to allow users up upload their ownuser_config.h
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: