Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The type basic property is named type_ but not documented #62

Open
qix opened this issue Jun 9, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

The type basic property is named type_ but not documented #62

qix opened this issue Jun 9, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@qix
Copy link

qix commented Jun 9, 2015

Is there a reason type is named type_ in the headers/spec?

It took me a while of digging for it, and notice it isn't mentioned at all in the documentation.
@majek
Copy link
Owner

majek commented Jun 9, 2015

"type" is a keyword in python.

@zuo
Copy link

zuo commented May 9, 2023 •
edited
Loading

type is not a keyword in Python. It is the name of a builtin, indeed. But, IMHO, that is not a legitimate reason to deviate from the AMQP specs, where the message property name is type, not type_.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@majek @qix @zuo