Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(jest): fail if more than expected matcher arguments are passed #199

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 1, 2024
Merged

feat(jest): fail if more than expected matcher arguments are passed #199

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 1, 2024

Conversation

m-radzikowski
Copy link
Owner

Prevents accidental calling toHaveReceivedCommand(Cmd, {}) instead of toHaveReceivedCommandWith(Cmd, {})

Closes #191

@m-radzikowski
feat: migrate Jest matchers to @jest/globals types
526a2ba 
Jest now includes own types in @jest/globals packages.
Use it for custom Jest matchers types.
Add declaration exposing custom matchers
in the "expect" library types.

Fixes #180
@m-radzikowski
feat(jest): fail if more than expected matcher arguments are passed
c69439e 
Prevents accidental calling toHaveReceivedCommand(Cmd, {})
instead of toHaveReceivedCommandWith(Cmd, {})

Closes #191
Base automatically changed from issue180 to main January 1, 2024 21:19
@m-radzikowski m-radzikowski merged commit 6f7bb59 into main Jan 1, 2024
2 checks passed
@m-radzikowski m-radzikowski deleted the issue191 branch January 1, 2024 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

toHaveReceivedCommand should throw an error if it receives a second parameter.
1 participant
@m-radzikowski