You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Performing head only reduction improved performance for the vast majority of test cases, still some suffered a minor performance hit. Indeed, it is possible that fully reducing just the hottest reducers (the base elements most used in reductions) will yield a great performance gain.
For one case, I found that 13% of the polynomials are responsible for 95% of reductions performed, so just fully reducing a polynomial when it gets used in more than 4 or 5% of past reductions might yield a net gain in performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Performing head only reduction improved performance for the vast majority of test cases, still some suffered a minor performance hit. Indeed, it is possible that fully reducing just the hottest reducers (the base elements most used in reductions) will yield a great performance gain.
For one case, I found that 13% of the polynomials are responsible for 95% of reductions performed, so just fully reducing a polynomial when it gets used in more than 4 or 5% of past reductions might yield a net gain in performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: