Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Three vs Babylon #1

Open
lpan opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Three vs Babylon #1

lpan opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@lpan
Copy link
Owner

lpan commented Nov 9, 2016

cc @cchan @kpsuperplane @tate1010
I will keep updating this thread as I continue exploring the two libraries

Advantage of three.js

  • Written in es6 modules -> supports tree shaking.
    • babylonjs
      image
    • three.js
      image
      Note WIth the same webpack.config, ThreeJS build is 7.2 times faster and 3 times smaller than the BabylonJS one!

Advantage of babylon.js

  • Relatively newer
  • Better community?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant