Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Blog] Why we decided to keep Juggler as our ORM #899

Closed
bajtos opened this issue Jan 23, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

[Blog] Why we decided to keep Juggler as our ORM #899

bajtos opened this issue Jan 23, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@bajtos
Copy link
Member

bajtos commented Jan 23, 2018

Write a blog post about the discussion we had in #537 and the decision we reached.

  • Explain why this discussion started in the first place
  • Summarize the arguments for keeping juggler and for switching to a different ORM
  • Explain why we decided to keep Juggler
  • Tell readers about the next steps we are planning
@shimks
Copy link
Contributor

shimks commented May 22, 2018

This should be given a priority (dp3 or non-dp3). I'd rather have this be part of DP3, but we may already be overloaded enough so I'm also ok with it being non-DP3 as well.

@dhmlau
Copy link
Member

dhmlau commented Sep 23, 2018

With "juggler-next" as the top of our backlog, I'd like this to mark as tob to explain our approach on "juggler-next".

@richardpringle
Copy link

@bajtos, any updates on a blog post date? (no pressure 😉)

@dhmlau dhmlau removed the TOB label Feb 12, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 7, 2020

This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository. This issue will be closed within 30 days of being stale.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Feb 7, 2020
@dhmlau dhmlau removed the stale label Feb 9, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 25, 2020

This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository. This issue will be closed within 30 days of being stale.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 25, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 14, 2021

This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants