Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] 支持配置openai兼容模型 #4943

Closed
chenzikun opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #5158
Closed

[Request] 支持配置openai兼容模型 #4943

chenzikun opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #5158
Labels
🌠 Feature Request New feature or request | 特性与建议 released

Comments

@chenzikun
Copy link

🥰 Feature Description

参照dify,实现一个openai-compatibel-api供应商,由用户自定义供应商.每一个模型都可以组定义api base

🧐 Proposed Solution

参照dify

📝 Additional Information

No response

@chenzikun chenzikun added the 🌠 Feature Request New feature or request | 特性与建议 label Dec 9, 2024
@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

👀 @chenzikun

Thank you for raising an issue. We will investigate into the matter and get back to you as soon as possible.
Please make sure you have given us as much context as possible.
非常感谢您提交 issue。我们会尽快调查此事,并尽快回复您。 请确保您已经提供了尽可能多的背景信息。

@hhh2210
Copy link

hhh2210 commented Dec 12, 2024

你这个需求,要么需要购买API自定义的版本,或者自己部署

@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


For your needs, you either need to purchase a customized version of the API or deploy it yourself.

@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

@chenzikun

This issue is closed, If you have any questions, you can comment and reply.
此问题已经关闭。如果您有任何问题,可以留言并回复。

@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.44.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🌠 Feature Request New feature or request | 特性与建议 released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants