We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Audit examples and change to use yaml output for schema details in examples.
We need "conduit_yaml" rep that includes details to replace the "conduit_json" output.
Also, "conduit_json" formatting is a little strange here:
"x": { "dtype":"float64", "number_of_elements": 5, "offset": 0, "stride": 24, "element_bytes": 8, "endianness": "little" , "value": [1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0]}, "y": { "dtype":"float64", "number_of_elements": 5, "offset": 8, "stride": 24, "element_bytes": 8, "endianness": "little" , "value": [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0]}, "z": { "dtype":"float64", "number_of_elements": 5, "offset": 16, "stride": 24, "element_bytes": 8, "endianness": "little" , "value": [3.0, 3.0, 3.0, 3.0, 3.0]} }
The logic that fuses the schema details with the values needs to be adjusted.
(from https://llnl-conduit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/blueprint.html#top-level-blueprint-interface)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Audit examples and change to use yaml output for schema details in examples.
We need "conduit_yaml" rep that includes details to replace the "conduit_json" output.
Also, "conduit_json" formatting is a little strange here:
The logic that fuses the schema details with the values needs to be adjusted.
(from https://llnl-conduit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/blueprint.html#top-level-blueprint-interface)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: