Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update changelog #623

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

chore: update changelog #623

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Release 5.7.4.

Release 5.7.4.
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

这个提交的changelog文件更新了dtkwidget的版本号,并添加了两个修复的描述。从提交信息来看,修复了两个问题:一个是ddialog的lambda函数可能导致段错误,另一个是某些窗口有双重标题栏。下面是对这个提交的一些改进建议:

  1. 版本号更新:确保版本号更新是正确的,并且遵循了语义化版本控制的原则。如果这是一个修复版本,应该遵循patch级别的更新(例如从5.7.3到5.7.4)。

  2. 修复描述:修复描述应该更加详细,说明具体修复了什么问题,以及如何修复的。例如:

    • fix: ddialog's lambda func may cause segfault 可以改为 fix: 修复了ddialog中lambda函数可能导致段错误的问题,通过修改lambda函数的捕获列表来解决。
    • fix: some windows have dual title bars 可以改为 fix: 修复了某些窗口显示双重标题栏的问题,通过调整窗口管理逻辑来确保标题栏的唯一性。
  3. 提交格式changelog文件的格式应该保持一致,确保每个条目都遵循相同的格式。例如,修复描述应该以-开头,并且每个条目之间应该有足够的空行。

  4. 签名:提交信息中的签名应该包含日期,并且格式应该统一。例如:

    -- Deepin Packages Builder <[email protected]>  Tue, 03 Dec 2024 02:00:46 +0000
    
  5. 版本号和提交信息的一致性:确保提交信息中的版本号与changelog文件中的版本号一致。

  6. 代码审查:虽然这个提交只更新了changelog文件,但建议在合并此提交之前,进行代码审查以确保修复确实解决了问题,并且没有引入新的问题。

综上所述,这个提交的changelog文件需要更新修复描述的详细性和格式,并确保版本号和提交信息的一致性。同时,建议在合并此提交之前进行代码审查。

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

TAG Bot

TAG: 5.7.4
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot, FeiWang1119

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants