Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: 音频单声道设置取消pipewire限制 #709

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

fly602
Copy link
Contributor

@fly602 fly602 commented Dec 13, 2024

音频单声道设置取消pipewire限制

Log: 音频单声道设置取消pipewire限制
pms: TASK-369199

音频单声道设置取消pipewire限制

Log: 音频单声道设置取消pipewire限制
pms: TASK-369199
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. 代码重复:在initupdateDefaultSinkSetMono函数中,对a.defaultSink.SetMono(a.Mono)的错误处理逻辑是相同的。建议将这部分逻辑提取到一个单独的函数中,以减少代码重复。

  2. 日志记录:在SetMono函数中,当音频服务器不支持设置单声道时,使用了logger.Warning记录警告日志。但是,这个函数的注释表明只有pipewire支持设置单声道。如果注释是准确的,那么在SetMono函数中检查音频服务器是否支持单声道设置可能是多余的。

  3. 错误处理:在SetMono函数中,当音频服务器不支持设置单声道时,返回了一个dbus.Error类型的错误。但是,这个函数的注释表明只有pipewire支持设置单声道。如果注释是准确的,那么返回dbus.Error可能不合适,应该返回一个更通用的错误类型,比如error

  4. 注释:在SetMono函数中,注释// 只有pipewire支持设置表明只有pipewire支持设置单声道。但是,这个注释与函数的实现逻辑不一致。如果注释是准确的,那么应该在函数中添加相应的检查逻辑。

  5. 代码风格:在SetMono函数中,注释// 只有pipewire支持设置与函数的其他注释不一致。建议统一注释的风格,例如使用//开头。

  6. 代码可读性:在SetMono函数中,注释// 只有pipewire支持设置与函数的其他注释不一致。建议统一注释的风格,例如使用//开头。

综上所述,建议对代码进行重构,以减少重复,提高代码的可读性和可维护性。同时,需要确保注释与代码逻辑一致,以避免混淆。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ECQZXC, fly602

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fly602 fly602 merged commit 1c6c9bf into linuxdeepin:master Dec 13, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants