Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 30, 2020. It is now read-only.

set connect timeout to a more reasonable value than 100ms #11

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ezbz
Copy link
Contributor

@ezbz ezbz commented Nov 26, 2012

...duction when zk is deployed across datacenters and the client is talking to an observer (IMO this should be externalized for the client to set via command line arg)

…production when zk is deployed across datacenters and the client is talking to an observer (IMO this should be externalized for the client to set via command line arg)
@ypujante
Copy link
Contributor

Would definitely accept a pull request with the suggested externalized configuration ;)

@ezbz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezbz commented Nov 28, 2012

Please review and test, I ran gradle test using gradle 0.9 but my groovy skills are miserable at best.

@ypujante
Copy link
Contributor

It looks fine. Thank you. I can merge to trunk but I won't release it/bundle it for a while. Let me know if that works for you or if you are ok like this (since you already build it from source, you may not need to have it merged to trunk right away...). When I work on glu 5.0 which will be to upgrade pretty much everything to latest (including jdk7), I will definitely release it then.

@ezbz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezbz commented Nov 29, 2012

Thanks, this is an after the fact pull request we (Outbrain) already compiled glu with a version that has 10s as the timeout value and deployed to prod. I'm good with waiting for 5.0

ypujante pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2013
…s in production when zk is deployed across datacenters and the client is talking to an observer (IMO this should be externalized for the client to set via command line arg)
ypujante added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2013
@ypujante
Copy link
Contributor

ypujante commented Apr 1, 2013

Merged in 1.5.0 (will also be part of glu 4.7.0)

@ypujante ypujante closed this Apr 1, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants