-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 613
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Installing sshfs fails on CentOS #342
Comments
For the legacy CentOS 7 (from 2014) it was not available in the distribution at all, so one had to use EPEL packages. https://centos.pkgs.org/7/epel-x86_64/fuse-sshfs-2.10-1.el7.x86_64.rpm.html |
Both "yum" and "dnf" (yum4) link to the same
|
It (fuse-sshfs) is not available as an RPM for Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so that is (ironically enough) unsupported for now... It can probably be built from source, if desired: fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.fc28.src.rpm. And the result put in an accessible dnf repo. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Alma Linux 9 beta is already released. RHEL9 is released and Rocky Linux 9 is expected to be released in a few month. I found EL's official base repos does not contain sshfs any more. Instead there is a fuse-sshfs in epel-release of every el version:
Should we rely on epel-release for sshfs? If so, we'd better install epel-release package before we install any pkgs: lima/pkg/cidata/cidata.TEMPLATE.d/boot/30-install-packages.sh Lines 63 to 72 in 234a65c
|
Yes, we should use EPEL |
I think the "PowerTools" and the "EPEL", were both built from the same original Fedora SRPM ? Ironically, the package for EL7 was newer than the one for EL8 - since it was actually bumped...
|
Apparently you need to enable "PowerTools", in order to have
sshfs
...https://centos.pkgs.org/8/centos-powertools-x86_64/fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.el8.x86_64.rpm.html
And probably should use "yum" rather than "dnf", on this distribution ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: