You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After successfully using it for a findAll() call, I built a Xyster_Data_Junction and wanted to use that for a find() call as well. Unfortunately, I found that find() only takes an array and that the downstream classes all are only supporting that array either. It would be good if findAll() and find() shared the same criteria schema.
For now, my personal workaround for this is to fallback to findAll():
After successfully using it for a findAll() call, I built a Xyster_Data_Junction and wanted to use that for a find() call as well. Unfortunately, I found that find() only takes an array and that the downstream classes all are only supporting that array either. It would be good if findAll() and find() shared the same criteria schema.
For now, my personal workaround for this is to fallback to findAll():
Reporter: Maurice Makaay
Begin: 2009-08-24
Completed: 0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: