-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AWS #1075
Comments
Don't have a good answer now, but I prefer setting up our own infrastructure. However, it will be more complicated and I currently don't have the time to help with that. If we haven't had any problem with AWS yet and nobody offers a better solution, just stick with it. |
AWS' Reserved Instance Recommendations confirm the ~35% savings if we pay one year upfront. Moreover it says the credits are "size-flexible", so we'll probably only lose money if we migrate away from AWS too soon. |
I dislike AWS. Smaller and more "libre" providers are a bit more expensive, but I would chip in to see a change away from AWS to that effect. |
Everyone dislikes AWS, yet nobody seems to have a realistic alternative to propose. |
Yes, so the best option is to keep using it until someone comes up with a replacement. Just saying we prefer small libre providers isn't enough, we must offer a proposal. I clarify it in case my opinion was misunderstood. |
Unless some numbers about the necessary resources (CPU, memory, HD) and software are presented, it is hard to suggest an alternative. |
@Changaco https://greenhost.net/ is rolling out a system that looks to be the best of both worlds. |
Have a look on https://www.hetzner.de (depending on load/storage dedicated or cloud might be more efficient, both seem much better bang-for-buck than aws), and maybe directly contact https://www.vikings.net. Both are hosting from Europe. |
When there will be enough donations, would a switch be possible? What should be the new goal on https://eo.liberapay.com/LiberapayOrg/ ? |
Traditional hosting providers aren't equivalent to AWS, they only provide machines with an OS preinstalled, whereas AWS is an entire ecosystem of services that make it easier to build a real web app, including databases (RDS), file storage (S3) and email delivery (SES). Running a web app outside of a cloud ecosystem like AWS means installing and maintaining auxiliary services yourself, which can cost a lot of time. Some traditional hosting providers have realized this and are starting to offer their own sets of services based on OpenStack, but they're a long way from being on par with AWS. |
Note: there are AWS competitors that I didn't know about when I first migrated Liberapay, for example IBM Cloud and Alibaba Cloud, however I'm not sure they have significant advantages. |
I've opened a new issue: #1727. |
Our estimated AWS bill for April is $53.91, almost entirely composed of EC2 (webapp) and RDS (database) costs. We can decrease the bill by ~35% next month if we pay upfront to reserve one year of what we currently use, however if we need to change anything or migrate off AWS in the next 8 months then we'll have lost money by paying upfront.
If you have any thoughts on what we could/should do feel free to share them here.
(The alternatives to AWS are still the same as a year ago, see #177 (comment).)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: