Replies: 3 comments 10 replies
-
Sounds good to me 👍 thank you for starting this discussion! This makes a lot of sense especially since OrganizeImports has special handling in Metals. Ive been using OrganizeImports in all of my projects for a while now and it’s working great. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Could we do a last release with the recent fixes for Scala 3 before merging to main scalafix? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Finally, Scalafix 0.11.0 includes Should we update the README (the docs was migrated in scalacenter/scalafix#1480), transfer the issues and archive the repo? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here I'd like to start a thread for merging
OrganizeImports
into Scalafix as a built-in rule and discussing possible work items needed to make it happen.Motivations:
Imports organization used to be a highly demanded Scalafix feature.
OrganizeImports
filled the gap and is now bundled by Metals. Making it a built-in rule of Scalafix removes a dependency from Metals and makes it easier to evolve this rule together with the ecosystem.OrganizeImports
is now relatively stable and feature-complete (Scala 3 support is still experimental and not shipped with any release yet, though).I'm personally no longer capable of maintaining this project because
Cc @bjaglin @tgodzik @olafurpg @mlachkar. Please let me know whether this proposal is feasible, and if yes, what could be the next steps?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions