-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance tuning (#1615) #1625
Conversation
wow, some good work, I will spend some time looking through this and then merge. I had a quick glance through and didn't see anything scary. |
Cool, thx! |
Yes! |
} | ||
rulesetNode.joinSelectors(paths, context, rulesetNode.selectors); | ||
if (!selectors) { rulesetNode.rules = null; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note to self, check this works with & {}
I just tried this branch in a rather complex app I have (>350 less files with varying includes) and it processed them ~45% faster(!), 👍 to get this in. |
I'm in the process of doing it. I may revert some of the micro |
That's awesome. Let me know if you want me to try anything out. Cheers Sorry for being brief, I sent this from my phone. /Andrée On 9 dec 2013, at 21:35, Luke Page [email protected] wrote: I'm in the process of doing it. I may revert some of the micro — |
thanks, this is committed. I made a few rollbacks, mainly around the jshint boss option (now on) e.g.
and "micro" caching. I don't think they made a difference, I still see a good improvment in speed, so thanks. |
Thank you fredburger for authoring these significant performance optimizations and to lukeapage for integrating them! Great work!! |
Performance tuning (#1615)
Various performance optimizations, without refactoring or messing up too much (hopefully?).
33% - 50% reduction in compilation time for bootstrap.less.
Compilation times for bootstrap.less: