You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear @lazappi,
'Clustree' is such an amazing piece of work that makes our job easier in clustering single-cell samples.
However, while reading your publication, under the "Building a Clustering Tree" section, directly under the figure, you say "Many of the edges will be empty, e.g., in Fig. 1 no samples in cluster A at k=2 end up in cluster B at k=3". As I am checking the figure, I noticed that it should be "... no samples in cluster A at k=2 end up in cluster C at k=3", am I right, or am I missing something?
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the kind words about {clustree} and clustering trees! I think you are right about there being a mistake in the manuscript 🙀. It should be either:
..in Fig.1 no samples in cluster A at k = 2 end up in cluster C at k = 3.
Or:
..in Fig.1 no samples in cluster B at k = 2 end up in cluster B at k = 3.
Hopefully that's obvious from looking at the figure and didn't cause too much confusion! It's a bit disappointing that we didn't catch it during the proofreading/reviewing process though 😿. Thanks for letting us know!
Dear @lazappi,
'Clustree' is such an amazing piece of work that makes our job easier in clustering single-cell samples.
However, while reading your publication, under the "Building a Clustering Tree" section, directly under the figure, you say "Many of the edges will be empty, e.g., in Fig. 1 no samples in cluster A at k=2 end up in cluster B at k=3". As I am checking the figure, I noticed that it should be "... no samples in cluster A at k=2 end up in cluster C at k=3", am I right, or am I missing something?
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: