Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect duplicate detection for imported notebooks with sub-notebooks #6704

Closed
MatsG23 opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
bug It's a bug desktop All desktop platforms high High priority issues import Related to importing files such as ENEX, JEX, etc.

Comments

@MatsG23
Copy link

MatsG23 commented Jul 29, 2022

Environment

Joplin version: 2.8.8 (prod, linux) installed from snap
Platform: Linux
OS specifics: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20220725 (Wayland) + KDE Plasma 5.25.3

Steps to reproduce

  1. Export a notebook with sub-notebooks to JEX
  2. Change the name of the notebook in the app to prevent a name conflict on import
  3. Import the created JEX file again
  4. Every sub-notebook gets a "(1)" added behind its name.

Describe what you expected to happen

Since there are no duplicate sub-notebooks names in the newly created notebook, the names should be kept. A number ("(1)", "(2)", ...) must not be added.

@MatsG23 MatsG23 added the bug It's a bug label Jul 29, 2022
@MatsG23 MatsG23 changed the title Wrong duplicate detection for imported notebooks with sub-notebooks Incorrect duplicate detection for imported notebooks with sub-notebooks Jul 29, 2022
@laurent22 laurent22 added desktop All desktop platforms high High priority issues import Related to importing files such as ENEX, JEX, etc. labels Jul 29, 2022
@kamalbuilds
Copy link

hi @laurent22 @MatsG23 can I work on this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug It's a bug desktop All desktop platforms high High priority issues import Related to importing files such as ENEX, JEX, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants