Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ingress-gce fails to create backend services when across zones with different balancing modes #480

Closed
nimeshksingh opened this issue Sep 18, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@nimeshksingh
Copy link

We have a gke cluster with two zones, one of which was added significantly later than the other. The ingress controller added backend services with a balancing mode of UTILIZATION for the first zone, and when we added the second zone it set the balancing mode in the new zone to RATE. Now when we try to add new backend services, it goes into a failure loop where it tries the RATE balancing mode, which fails in one zone, then tries the UTILIZATION balancing mode, which fails in the second zone. This continues forever and we're blocked from adding new backends.

Image showing the initial state before trying to add a second backend service:
screen shot 2018-09-17 at 5 45 12 pm

GKE Master version: 1.10.7-gke.1

@bowei bowei self-assigned this Sep 18, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 17, 2018
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Jan 2, 2019

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 2, 2019
@bowei bowei added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jan 2, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 2, 2019
@rramkumar1
Copy link
Contributor

@nimeshksingh Is this still occurring? My understanding is that this should already be handled semi-gracefully but maybe you have hit an edge case.

@rramkumar1 rramkumar1 added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 17, 2019
@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member

Closing as there has been no update since 2019.

@swetharepakula swetharepakula closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants