Graduating networks
peer to standard channel from experimental
#259
Labels
lifecycle/stale
Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Describe the issue:
We added support for
networks
peer which is a list of inline CIDRs #185There are currently two implementations definitely who have implemented this:
Other CNI implementations like Kube-OVN are waiting for this API to be in standard channel rather than experimental: kubeovn/kube-ovn#3247 (comment)
are there any concerns from the maintainers of the repo if I move this peer to standard channel?
@danwinship / @Dyanngg / @aojea / @astoycos ?
As per our docs: https://network-policy-api.sigs.k8s.io/versioning/?h=beta#experimental-standard (I can open another issue to track what we spoke about whether we want standard/experimental to mean stability OR optional but for all intents and purposes of this field there was no controversies on the optional/mandatory bits so we should try to focus on stability aspects here); it seems I need to fullfill alpha->beta chain of events: https://network-policy-api.sigs.k8s.io/versioning/?h=beta#alpha-beta
so we seems to satisfy most of the requirements here. Only missing bit is validation which I was waiting for 1.31 kube to have isCIDR validation: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/network-policy-api/pull/256/files#diff-e14a317f3c12a983e1037dec16d99833bd1398ab66a65a8b6476adad81d05b1cR150 so once we fix the bump to 1.31 we should be able to move networks peer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: