Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Graduating networks peer to standard channel from experimental #259

Open
tssurya opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Graduating networks peer to standard channel from experimental #259

tssurya opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 24, 2024

Describe the issue:

We added support for networks peer which is a list of inline CIDRs #185

There are currently two implementations definitely who have implemented this:

  1. OVN-Kubernetes
  2. Calico

Other CNI implementations like Kube-OVN are waiting for this API to be in standard channel rather than experimental: kubeovn/kube-ovn#3247 (comment)

are there any concerns from the maintainers of the repo if I move this peer to standard channel?

@danwinship / @Dyanngg / @aojea / @astoycos ?

As per our docs: https://network-policy-api.sigs.k8s.io/versioning/?h=beta#experimental-standard (I can open another issue to track what we spoke about whether we want standard/experimental to mean stability OR optional but for all intents and purposes of this field there was no controversies on the optional/mandatory bits so we should try to focus on stability aspects here); it seems I need to fullfill alpha->beta chain of events: https://network-policy-api.sigs.k8s.io/versioning/?h=beta#alpha-beta

so we seems to satisfy most of the requirements here. Only missing bit is validation which I was waiting for 1.31 kube to have isCIDR validation: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/network-policy-api/pull/256/files#diff-e14a317f3c12a983e1037dec16d99833bd1398ab66a65a8b6476adad81d05b1cR150 so once we fix the bump to 1.31 we should be able to move networks peer.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Oct 24, 2024

/assign @tssurya

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Oct 24, 2024

I will also tag all active community members for awareness
@npinaeva @fasaxc @nathanjsweet

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Oct 24, 2024

Networks is the new IPBlocks, right?

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Oct 24, 2024

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants