-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature: add more meaningful fields to crd objects #210
Comments
/assign |
@googs1025 Yes, I think adding "READY" and "UP-TO-Update" will be very useful |
That's great, but there's a small problem. kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder#4134 This problem can be solved by adding an extra field to the status, but I don't think this is a good way to handle it. Maybe we can wait until this problem is solved before implementing it |
issue tracked: kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools#1051 |
Glad to see this aligned with deployment or statefulset which has richer columns. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
@googs1025 are you still planning to address this issue? |
thanks for reply. @ahg-g |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
What would you like to be added:
Currently, when using kubectl get with lws , there are only two fields displayed: name and age. We should provide more meaningful fields to make it more convenient to use.
We should provide more meaningful fields, which will be more convenient to use
as follows:
There were some minor problems during implementation. FRY: kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder#4134
I am not sure whether the current JSONPath of kubebuilder can achieve a display effect similar to (X/Y). In addition, should we add other useful fields (maybe we can also discuss this PR)? If not, I will close this issue
Why is this needed:
Completion requirements:
This enhancement requires the following artifacts:
The artifacts should be linked in subsequent comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: