-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For low EC values, correction gives increasingly negative bulk EC values #3
Comments
For sure. I even had/have plans to make a calibration manual with 4 or 5 formulas with different EC (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1) to have more reliable calibration points. Since my data is limited to a few EC ranges from a pot with a real plant. |
I bought more THC-S sensors and I found that's not a very realiable sensor since the measured bulk EC varies between sensors in the same substrate. Maybe create a method and a simple calc app to solve this:
|
I've been doing some experimentation. The method that has worked best, which I think is simplest, is to do a linear calibration of the bulk ec with distilled water (~0 mS/cm) and a solution in the 1-1.5mS/cm range. I got this equation for the bulk_ec for both of my sensors using this method: soil_ec = 1.93 * soil_ec - 270.8; Then the rest of the equations you used for the pore EC seem to be working fine. |
Great! Thanks for the support Daniel. I will update the code with your changes. |
The equation suggested gives negative values below around 250 uS/cm.
This causes my sensor to give negative readings a large percentage of the time for bulk EC and pore EC values. I would suggest calibration points to include solutions with EC of 0 (distilled water) in media that has no conductivity contribution (rockwool for example) to avoid this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: