You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the stated goals of our Emacs configuration is to:
Have a focus on excellent support for individual languages.
The problem of supporting many languages is a complicated one. For the community, the workload required to support m languages on n editors is O(mn), as you might expect.
LSP, the Language Server Protocol, aims to turn this from O(mn) to O(m + n), by offloading general tasks to a separate process that is implemented for the specific language. In this way, an editor only needs to implement bindings to connect to a language server and handle its responses, and the language server can be provided by those who are familiar with the language.
Is there interest in adopting lsp-mode? It has nice integrations with flycheck and company-mode too.
Here's an example of what lsp-ui presents in rust-mode. Quite rich!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One of the stated goals of our Emacs configuration is to:
The problem of supporting many languages is a complicated one. For the community, the workload required to support m languages on n editors is O(m n), as you might expect.
LSP, the Language Server Protocol, aims to turn this from O(m n) to O(m + n), by offloading general tasks to a separate process that is implemented for the specific language. In this way, an editor only needs to implement bindings to connect to a language server and handle its responses, and the language server can be provided by those who are familiar with the language.
Is there interest in adopting lsp-mode? It has nice integrations with flycheck and company-mode too.
Here's an example of what
lsp-ui
presents in rust-mode. Quite rich!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: