You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The paper says "Experimentally, cvisit = 50, cscale = 1.0 allowed us to use the same hyperparameters
even if changing the number of simulations.". I think you mentioned about Figure 5(b), it is the result of the beam_rider.
Needless to say, C_SCALE = 1.0 might be not optimal value, it brings reasonably good results on Go.
According to paper, the best
C_SCALE
value is0.1
on 9x9 board. Why did you use1
. Did you tune it by your personal experiment?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: