You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As opposed to the mortar method of #305, I've been looking at 'monolithic' approaches to linear elastic problems (like say ‘structural vibration’ ex21) with multiple subdomains with different densities and Lamé parameters (as for heat transfer in ‘insulated wire’ ex17).
The approach of ex17 using subdomains worked fine, requiring only a minor modification of skfem.models.elasticity.linear_elasticity to:
I think it should be possible to combine this into the one in skfem.models.elasticity so that it works whether w is a pair of scalars or, as here, a numpy.ndarray of shape (2, ib.nelems, len(ib.W)), formed with
This discussion was converted from issue #315 on November 28, 2022 12:33.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
As opposed to the mortar method of #305, I've been looking at 'monolithic' approaches to linear elastic problems (like say ‘structural vibration’ ex21) with multiple subdomains with different densities and Lamé parameters (as for heat transfer in ‘insulated wire’ ex17).
The approach of ex17 using subdomains worked fine, requiring only a minor modification of
skfem.models.elasticity.linear_elasticity
to:I think it should be possible to combine this into the one in
skfem.models.elasticity
so that it works whetherw
is a pair of scalars or, as here, anumpy.ndarray
of shape(2, ib.nelems, len(ib.W))
, formed withBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions