We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I just found the following problem, although since the data is extracted from a PDF I'm not sure it's the right place where to fix the issue.
The following DOI: 10.1063/1.1905789͔ comes out with a nasty 9͔ ...
10.1063/1.1905789͔
9͔
Crossref find the record: https://search.crossref.org/?from_ui=&q=10.1063%2F1.1905789%CD%94 The data is extracted from the publisher version of the manuscript: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.1905789
Although I think this is not glutton lookup's responsibility, I think having a small pre-processing that removes crap could be nice anyway .
Update: I've checked and since we lookup by DOI directly from LMDB it's a rather strict matching (we lowercase already)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I just found the following problem, although since the data is extracted from a PDF I'm not sure it's the right place where to fix the issue.
The following DOI:
10.1063/1.1905789͔comes out with a nasty9͔...Crossref find the record: https://search.crossref.org/?from_ui=&q=10.1063%2F1.1905789%CD%94
The data is extracted from the publisher version of the manuscript: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.1905789
Although I think this is not glutton lookup's responsibility, I think having a small pre-processing that removes crap could be nice anyway .
Update: I've checked and since we lookup by DOI directly from LMDB it's a rather strict matching (we lowercase already)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: