-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[KED-2385] Refactor row toggle/label CSS, and fix row hover icon bug #358
Conversation
Instead of having just the _row.scss file and then filter overrides in _filter.scss, instead create one file for all the text label scss (both toggle/filter kinds), and one for the toggle-icon scss (both kinds)
The toggle-all icon would decrease in opacity on row hover. This commit fixes this
This should make the two node-row items a bit easier to identify.
The row hover effect would not show up on the parent when unchecked. I've reverted the previous fix and instead have ensured that the --checked modifier rule overrides the hover rule
@studioswong Good catch, thanks! 🙌 Fixed 😅 |
position: absolute; | ||
top: 0; | ||
bottom: 0; | ||
left: -100px; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
optional: I noticed that we use em
in some places ( for fonts and margins) and px
in others, do we normally have any preference on which to use?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would typically use em
where we want it to be related/relative to font-size, and px
where it should be absolute.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for fixing - LGTF 👍
# Release 3.9.0 ## Major features and improvements - Add code panel (#346) - Improve view panning behaviour when a node is selected (#356, #363, #370, #373, #374) - Improve layout performance for large graphs (#343) - Save tag state to localStorage (#353) ## Bug fixes and other changes - Improve graph layout code quality, performance and docs (#347) - Update docs to remind on compatibility of Kedro-Viz 3.8.0 with Kedro 0.17 (#367) - Update dependencies (#360, #364, #369) - Fix failing CircleCI build on Windows (#365, #366) - Refactor node-list-row CSS, fixing hover and focus states (#355, #358, #362) - Update iconography (#357, #359) - Fix missing indicator Chrome zoom bug (#349) - Fix sidebar border/box-shadow CSS rules (#351) - Fix server.py to work with versions >0.17 and update contributing docs (#348) - Fix errors when scrolling with empty pipeline (#342) - Ignore coverage on some branches and fix e2e tests (#345) - Fix icon-button tooltips on mobile (#344) - Update SVG-Crowbar to fix errors (#339) - Update contributing docs for new dev server (#341)
Description
--kind-toggle
to--kind-element
to make the distinction between the two elements a bit more clear. We can rename them again later if necessary but I think this makes things a lot easier to understand.Development notes
I discussed the naming of the two node-list row item kinds with @bru5 at length while working on this PR. We want to strike a balance between intuitiveness and extensibility, which is why we've avoided being too specific in the names of the two kinds (e.g. calling filters 'category', which might not work with future usages, or calling them 'blue-dot' and 'eye-icon', which is too dependent on the presentation).
QA notes
Please double-check the node-list hover/focus/selection states and see that nothing has changed (except for the blue dot checked parent row-hover state, which has been fixed).
Checklist
RELEASE.md
fileLegal notice
I acknowledge and agree that, by checking this box and clicking "Submit Pull Request":
I submit this contribution under the Apache 2.0 license and represent that I am entitled to do so on behalf of myself, my employer, or relevant third parties, as applicable.
I certify that (a) this contribution is my original creation and / or (b) to the extent it is not my original creation, I am authorised to submit this contribution on behalf of the original creator(s) or their licensees.
I certify that the use of this contribution as authorised by the Apache 2.0 license does not violate the intellectual property rights of anyone else.