Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Python Upper-Bound requirements #1505

Closed
1 task done
ravi-kumar-pilla opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1506
Closed
1 task done

Remove Python Upper-Bound requirements #1505

ravi-kumar-pilla opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1506
Assignees
Labels
Issue: Feature Request Python Pull requests that update Python code

Comments

@ravi-kumar-pilla
Copy link
Contributor

Description

As Kedro and kedro-datasets are now lifting the upper bound for python completely, this ticket aims at removing the upper bounds and adding a warning for Kedro Viz

Context

This change would allow Kedro Viz to be consistent with Kedro and kedro-datasets. Also, users receive a warning when running kedro viz on a python version which may not be fully compatible.

Possible Implementation

Allow any version of Python (including 3.11) in metadata

Possible Alternatives

Checklist

  • Include labels so that we can categorise your feature request
@ravi-kumar-pilla ravi-kumar-pilla added the Python Pull requests that update Python code label Aug 25, 2023
@ravi-kumar-pilla ravi-kumar-pilla moved this to In Progress in Kedro-Viz Aug 25, 2023
@ravi-kumar-pilla ravi-kumar-pilla self-assigned this Aug 25, 2023
@ravi-kumar-pilla ravi-kumar-pilla moved this from In Progress to In Review in Kedro-Viz Aug 28, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in Kedro-Viz Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue: Feature Request Python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant