Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: event model and event type API #27

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2018
Merged

feat: event model and event type API #27

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2018

Conversation

dan-ziv
Copy link
Contributor

@dan-ziv dan-ziv commented Nov 7, 2018 •
edited by OrenMe
Loading

Description of the Changes

Added getEventModel and EventType API.
See docs for more info.

CheckLists

  • changes have been done against master branch, and PR does not conflict
  • new unit / functional tests have been added (whenever applicable)
  • test are passing in local environment
  • Travis tests are passing (or test results are not worse than on master branch :))
  • Docs have been updated

@dan-ziv dan-ziv requested a review from a team November 7, 2018 10:01
@OrenMe OrenMe changed the title feat: event model API feat: event model and type API Nov 7, 2018
@dan-ziv dan-ziv changed the title feat: event model and type API feat: event model and event type API Nov 7, 2018
@dan-ziv dan-ziv merged commit 0d47045 into master Nov 7, 2018
@dan-ziv dan-ziv deleted the event-model-api branch November 7, 2018 12:55
DanilMolchanovKaltura pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
@lianbenjamin
fix(FEC-13442): fix default flavor and captions (#27)
99ebfef 
### Description of the Changes

make sure we have default flavor and default captions.

Solves FEC-13442
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@OrenMe OrenMe OrenMe approved these changes

Assignees

@dan-ziv dan-ziv

Labels
Type: Feature
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@dan-ziv @OrenMe