You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The MPL-2.0 license requires that a copy of the license text is included with (re-)distributed sources. The separately published compose_spec_macros crate currently doesn't contain the license text.
I'm working on packaging this crate for Fedora Linux as a dependency of podlet, and not having the license file included requires awkward workarounds for us (and technically you and crates.io are violating your own license terms by redistributing the source code without accompanying license text via crates.io).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oops, sorry about that. This was my first published project using cargo workspaces. Would adding a symlink to the LICENSE file in the compose_spec_macros directory work for your purposes? cargo package -p compose_spec_macros seems to pick it up that way.
Yes, adding a symbolic link is enough so long as you run cargo publish on any operating system that supports symbolic links (i.e. not Windows). Thank you for looking into it!
The MPL-2.0 license requires that a copy of the license text is included with (re-)distributed sources. The separately published compose_spec_macros crate currently doesn't contain the license text.
I'm working on packaging this crate for Fedora Linux as a dependency of podlet, and not having the license file included requires awkward workarounds for us (and technically you and crates.io are violating your own license terms by redistributing the source code without accompanying license text via crates.io).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: