Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Add virtual "aggregated" stations #13

Open
ndrpnt opened this issue May 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Suggestion] Add virtual "aggregated" stations #13

ndrpnt opened this issue May 8, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@ndrpnt
Copy link

ndrpnt commented May 8, 2022

Hi, I'd love to display the direct connections from a city, as opposed to a single station. I.e, have a "Berlin (any station)" option in the search bar.

@juliuste
Copy link
Owner

juliuste commented May 20, 2022

I agree that this feature makes sense, however this is not really trivial to get working with the existing datasource(s), especially for the autocompletion/search. Will try to think about possible solutions over the next few days, feel free to ping me again if I forget 😄

@AghiadHaloul
Copy link

AghiadHaloul commented Jul 15, 2022

I was thinking about a similar suggestion as well :)

Maybe instead of having a city as a destination source, the user could write type in two(+) stations, and then the results from both stations are merged and displayed (duplicates results could show the shorter time).

This is helpful for "twin-cities" situations likes Ulm(BaWü) and Neu-Ulm(Bayern) laying on opposite sides of the river, Mannheim/Ludwigshafen, as well as small towns which have different closest-train-station-that-is-30-mins-away (Harz mountains).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants