You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I'd love to display the direct connections from a city, as opposed to a single station. I.e, have a "Berlin (any station)" option in the search bar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that this feature makes sense, however this is not really trivial to get working with the existing datasource(s), especially for the autocompletion/search. Will try to think about possible solutions over the next few days, feel free to ping me again if I forget 😄
I was thinking about a similar suggestion as well :)
Maybe instead of having a city as a destination source, the user could write type in two(+) stations, and then the results from both stations are merged and displayed (duplicates results could show the shorter time).
This is helpful for "twin-cities" situations likes Ulm(BaWü) and Neu-Ulm(Bayern) laying on opposite sides of the river, Mannheim/Ludwigshafen, as well as small towns which have different closest-train-station-that-is-30-mins-away (Harz mountains).
Hi, I'd love to display the direct connections from a city, as opposed to a single station. I.e, have a "Berlin (any station)" option in the search bar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: